GenZ Now , one of the largest contemporary studies of Jewish American teenagers, surveyed 17, young people. Significantly, the vast majority of respondents were affiliated in some way with a Jewish youth group. The resultant page report represents a collaborative effort championed by the New York-based Jewish Education Project and funded in part by the San Francisco-based Jim Joseph Foundation.
A healthy 82 percent of teens surveyed said they feel a strong connection with their Jewish heritage. Many said the connection comes from their sense of pride about Jewish success, survival and cultural contributions. There was less certainty around religion. The Aramaic of the Zohar is not very sophisticated and appears to be written by someone who did not know Aramaic as a native language.
Moreover, vocabulary from medieval Spanish and Portuguese is prevalent in the language of the Zohar. This accords with the traditional claim by adherents that Kabbalah is the concealed part of the Oral Torah. While the traditional majority view in religious Judaism has been that the teachings of Kabbalah lit.
Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan posited a theory that there was an ancient core text of the Zohar which antedated Leon, but that several strata of text were added over time. The view of some non-Chasidic Orthodox Jews and Orthodox groups, as well as non-Orthodox Jewish denominations, generally conforms to Scholem's view, and as such, most such groups have long viewed the Zohar as pseudepigraphy and apocrypha , while sometimes accepting that its contents may have meaning for modern Judaism.
Jewish prayerbooks edited by non-Orthodox Jews may therefore contain excerpts from the Zohar and other kabbalistic works,  even if the editors do not literally believe that they are oral traditions from the time of Moses. In the Bible , the word "Zohar" appears in the vision of Ezekiel and is usually translated as meaning radiance or light.
It appears again in Daniel , "Those who are wise will shine like the brightness of the heavens". Suspicions aroused by the facts that the Zohar was discovered by one person and that it refers to historical events of the post- Talmudic period while purporting to be from an earlier time, caused the authorship to be questioned from the outset. A story tells that after the death of Moses de Leon, a rich man of Avila named Joseph offered Moses' widow who had been left without any means of supporting herself a large sum of money for the original from which her husband had made the copy.
She confessed that her husband himself was the author of the work. She had asked him several times, she said, why he had chosen to credit his own teachings to another, and he had always answered that doctrines put into the mouth of the miracle-working Shimon bar Yochai would be a rich source of profit. The story indicates that shortly after its appearance the work was believed by some to have been written by Moses de Leon. Isaac's testimony, which appeared in the first edition of Sefer Yuchasin, was censored from the second edition  and remained absent from all editions thereafter until its restoration nearly years later in the edition.
Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan states that Isaac evidently did not believe her since Isaac quotes the Zohar was authored by Rabbi Shimon bar Yohai in a manuscript in Kaplan's possession. Kaplan concludes saying this was the probable series of events. The Zohar spread among the Jews with remarkable swiftness. Scarcely fifty years had passed since its appearance in Spain before it was quoted by many Kabbalists , including the Italian mystical writer Menahem Recanati and by Todros Abulafia.
By the 15th century, its authority in the Spanish Jewish community was such that Joseph ibn Shem-Tov drew from it arguments in his attacks against Maimonides , and even representatives of non-mystical Jewish thought began to assert its sacredness and invoke its authority in the decision of some ritual questions. In Jacobs' and Broyde's view, they were attracted by its glorification of man, its doctrine of immortality , and its ethical principles, which they saw as more in keeping with the spirit of Talmudic Judaism than are those taught by the philosophers, and which was held in contrast to the view of Maimonides and his followers, who regarded man as a fragment of the universe whose immortality is dependent upon the degree of development of his active intellect.
The Zohar instead declared Man to be the lord of the creation , whose immortality is solely dependent upon his morality. Conversely, Elijah Delmedigo c. He claims that if it were his work, the Zohar would have been mentioned by the Talmud , as has been the case with other works of the Talmudic period; he claims that had bar Yochai known by divine revelation the hidden meaning of the precepts, his decisions on Jewish law from the Talmudic period would have been adopted by the Talmud, that it would not contain the names of rabbis who lived at a later period than that of bar Yochai; he claims that if the Kabbalah was a revealed doctrine, there would have been no divergence of opinion among the Kabbalists concerning the mystic interpretation of the precepts.
Believers in the authenticity of the Zohar countered that the lack of references to the work in Jewish literature was because bar Yohai did not commit his teachings to writing but transmitted them orally to his disciples over generations until finally the doctrines were embodied in the Zohar. They found it unsurprising that bar Yochai should have foretold future happenings or made references to historical events of the post-Talmudic period.
The authenticity of the Zohar was accepted by such 16th century Jewish luminaries as R' Yosef Karo d. Debate continued over the generations; Delmedigo's arguments were echoed by Leon of Modena d. Emden argued that the Zohar misquotes passages of Scripture; misunderstands the Talmud; contains some ritual observances that were ordained by later rabbinical authorities; mentions The Crusades against Muslims who did not exist in the 2nd century ; uses the expression " esnoga ", a Portuguese term for " synagogue "; and gives a mystical explanation of the Hebrew vowel points , which were not introduced until long after the Talmudic period.
Acceptance was not uniform, however. The Noda Bihudah d. Among its objects was the opposition of the influence of the Zohar and subsequent developments in modern Kabbalah , which were then pervasive in Yemenite Jewish life, restoration of what they believed to be a rationalistic approach to Judaism rooted in authentic sources, and safeguardal of the older " Baladi " tradition of Yemenite Jewish observance that preceded the Kabbalah.
Most of Orthodox Judaism holds that the teachings of Kabbalah were transmitted from teacher to teacher, in a long and continuous chain, from the Biblical era until its redaction by Shimon bar Yochai. Some fully accept the claims that the Kabbalah's teachings are in essence a revelation from God to the Biblical patriarch Abraham , Moses and other ancient figures, but were never printed and made publicly available until the time of the Zohar's medieval publication.
R' Yechiel Michel Epstein d. Rabbis Eliyahu Dessler d. Within Orthodox Judaism the traditional view that Shimon bar Yochai was the author is prevalent. Concerning the Zohar's lack of knowledge of the land of Israel, Scholem bases this on the many references to a city Kaputkia Cappadocia which he states was situated in Turkey, not in Israel. Another theory as to the authorship of the Zohar is that it was transmitted like the Talmud before it was transcribed: as an oral tradition reapplied to changing conditions and eventually recorded.
AmericanA to Z – Silver Jews – Americana UK
This view believes that the Zohar was not written by Shimon bar Yochai, but is a holy work because it consisted of his principles. Belief in the authenticity of the Zohar among Orthodox Jewish movements can be seen in various forms online today. Featured on Chabad. The Zohar figures prominently in the mysticism of Chabad. Another leading Orthodox online outlet, Aish. Jews in non-Orthodox Jewish denominations accept the conclusions of historical academic studies on the Zohar and other kabbalistic texts.
As such, most non-Orthodox Jews have long viewed the Zohar as pseudepigraphy and apocrypha. Nonetheless, many accepted that some of its contents had meaning for modern Judaism.
Siddurim edited by non-Orthodox Jews often have excerpts from the Zohar and other kabbalistic works, e. Siddur Sim Shalom edited by Jules Harlow , even though the editors are not kabbalists. In recent years there has been a growing willingness of non-Orthodox Jews to study the Zohar, and a growing minority have a position that is similar to the Modern Orthodox position described above. This seems pronounced among Jews who follow the path of Jewish Renewal.
The A to Z of Prophets in Islam and Judaism
Among other things, Scholem noticed the Zohar's frequent errors in Aramaic grammar, its suspicious traces of Spanish words and sentence patterns, and its lack of knowledge of the land of Israel. Parts of it may be based on older works, and it was a common practice to ascribe the authorship of a document to an ancient rabbi in order to give the document more weight. In the Encyclopaedia Judaica article written by Professor Gershom Scholem of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem there is an extensive discussion of the sources cited in the Zohar. Scholem views the author of the Zohar as having based the Zohar on a wide variety of pre-existing Jewish sources, while at the same time inventing a number of fictitious works that the Zohar supposedly quotes, e.
Scholem's views are widely held as accurate among historians of the Kabbalah , but like all textual historical investigations, are not uncritically accepted; most of the following conclusions are still accepted as accurate, although academic analysis of the original texts has progressed dramatically since Scholem's ground-breaking research. Scholars that continue to research the background of the Zohar include Yehuda Liebes who wrote his doctorate degree for Scholem on the subject of a Dictionary of the Vocabulary of the Zohar in , and Daniel C.
Here comes Gen Z: the next generation of Jews, by the numbers
Matt , also a student of Scholem, who is currently reconstructing a critical edition of the Zohar based on original unpublished manuscripts. While many original ideas in the Zohar are presented as being from fictitious Jewish mystical works, many ancient and clearly rabbinic mystical teachings are presented without their real, identifiable sources being named. Academic studies of the Zohar show that many of its ideas are based in the Talmud, various works of midrash , and earlier Jewish mystical works. Scholem writes:.
- Rimon: The Minnesota Jewish Arts Council.
- Chinese Lexicography: A History from 1046 BC to AD 1911.
- Zohar - Wikipedia.
- La vita dei numeri ultimi (Italian Edition)?
- El tata Dios: Milenarismo y xenofobia en las pampas (Spanish Edition)!
- The Student's Encyclopedia of Judaism!
- Big Bears Big Boat;
The author of the Zohar drew upon the Bible commentaries written by medieval rabbis, including Rashi , Abraham ibn Ezra , David Kimhi and even authorities as late as Nahmanides and Maimonides. Scholem gives a variety of examples of such borrowings. The Zohar draws upon early mystical texts such as the Sefer Yetzirah and the Bahir , and the early medieval writings of the Hasidei Ashkenaz.
Another influence on the Zohar that Scholem, and scholars like Yehudah Liebes and Ronit Meroz have identified  was a circle of Spanish Kabbalists in Castile who dealt with the appearance of an evil side emanating from within the world of the sephirot. Scholem saw this dualism of good and evil within the Godhead as a kind of " gnostic " inclination within Kabbalah, and as a predecessor of the Sitra Ahra the other, evil side in the Zohar.
The main text of the Castile circle, the Treatise on the Left Emanation , was written by Jacob ha-Cohen in around The Tikunei haZohar was first printed in Mantua in The main body of the Zohar was printed in Cremona in a one-volume edition , in Mantua in a three-volume edition , and in Salonika in a two-volume edition.
itesaltsabga.cf Each of these editions included somewhat different texts. These were later printed as " Zohar Chadash " lit.
The term "Zohar", in usage, may refer to just the first Zohar collection, with or without the applicable sections of Zohar Chadash, or to the entire Zohar and Tikunim. Citations referring to the Zohar conventionally follow the volume and page numbers of the Mantua edition; while citations referring to Tikkunei haZohar follow the edition of Ortakoy Constantinople whose text and pagination became the basis for most subsequent editions.
Volumes II and III begin their numbering anew, so citation can be made by parashah and page number e. Zohar: Nasso a , or by volume and page number e. Zohar IIIa. Unlike other Jewish traditions, which depict God in relatively simple terms, the Zohar is intentionally obscure.